Monday, November 29, 2004

Air travel


Air travel gets worse, not better. I understand that there’s increasing competition in the marketplace, so that “service” is cut to the bare minimum to keep the profit margin positive. I also understand that there’s constant pressure to keep the airlines safe from terrorism, even though it’s my personal belief that traveling by air has never been safer, and will only cease to be so when we drop our guard – and the terrorists have infinite patience. And I know that it makes economic sense to leave aircraft fuselages unpainted in order to save 100 lbs of weight that would increase fuel costs at a time when oil prices are spiraling out of control.

These things creep up on you unnoticed, until you travel, as I did today, with a couple from the “old school”. They remember days when you got dressed up to fly, when meals were recognizable (and were perhaps even preceded by a printed menu), when “wide-bodied” referred to the aircraft, and not the flight attendants, when “beverages”, alcoholic or otherwise, were free, and when both passengers and flight attendants were civil to each other.

Those days are gone, and the couple looked positively anachronistic – he, unmistakably British, in cord trousers and tweed jacket over a thin woolly jumper with blue-and-white striped shirt and regimental tie, grey and balding, with a frequent and annoying “foreign-office” “har-har-har” laugh; she, a Dallas native, on the obligatory annual trip to see relatives (although sacrificing neither Thanksgiving nor Christmas), in a smart twin-set and red court shoes with gold buckles, and an accent that was a curious attempt at a mixture of wealthy American and British upper class; they, talking, as if on stage, in slightly projected tones, so that everyone could receive the benefit of their insights and exploits, though, traveling in coach, they could clearly not afford to live in the manner to which they would like to become accustomed.

They seemed happy. No doubt they moved in circles that maintained their illusion, and remained largely impervious to the world outside (attempted conversations about contemporary films and music failed dismally). Nobody ever said change was for the better, and, for once, I agree with them.